Reviewers should conduct objective evaluations.
When evaluating articles, reviewers should avoid using language and style to insult the author or humiliate his honor and dignity.
Reviewers must ensure that all information related to a submitted article is kept confidential until the article is published.
If reviewers find plagiarism or copying in an article which are evaluated by them, they should report it to the editor-in-chief or editor.
Before the evaluation of the article, if the reviewer cannot complete and send it within the specified time, must notify the editor-in-chief or editor in advance. 
When any article is accepted for evaluation by a reviewer, evaluation should be done in accordance with what is stated in the “Evaluation and evaluation form” posted on the website of the scientific journal (link) and the notes should be written in that part as well.